Preparing for the NHI: A Guide for Medical Professionals

by | Aug 22, 2025 | Medical Malpractice Insurance

The National Health Insurance (NHI) Act, signed into law in May 2024, marks a monumental shift in South Africa’s healthcare landscape, aiming to achieve universal health coverage by establishing a single public purchaser of healthcare services – the National Health Insurance Fund. This ambitious reform seeks to create an equitable, efficient, and affordable healthcare system for all, irrespective of socioeconomic status. For medical professionals across South Africa, understanding the intricacies of the NHI, its phased implementation, the ongoing legal challenges, and the proactive steps required for readiness is paramount for practice sustainability and continued provision of high-quality patient care. So, how should you go about preparing for the NHI? Keep reading to find out.


Legislative Status and Phased Roll-out

The National Health Insurance Act (Act 20 of 2023) was officially signed into law by President Cyril Ramaphosa on May 15, 2024. This legislative milestone signals the government’s firm commitment to transforming healthcare financing and delivery in the country. The Act’s core purpose is to establish and maintain the NHI Fund, which will serve as a mechanism to pool public revenue through mandatory prepayment, acting as the sole purchaser of care. This system is intended to ensure sustainable and affordable universal access to quality healthcare services for all South African citizens, permanent residents, refugees, and certain other categories like inmates. In practice, individuals must register as users of the Fund at accredited providers to access benefits, though the Act also reaffirms everyone’s constitutional right to healthcare.

The NHI Act establishes an autonomous National Health Insurance Fund as a Schedule 3A public entity, accountable to the Minister of Health. It will be managed by a Board and a Chief Executive Officer (CEO), guided by expert committees. The Fund’s primary functions include pooling allocated funds, strategically purchasing services, medicines, and supplies from accredited providers, entering contracts, determining payment rates, and ensuring timely reimbursement. It is mandated to prioritize equity and efficiency, collecting data on utilization and population health, maintaining a national database, and reporting on its performance to the Minister.

The government has outlined a phased rollout schedule for the NHI:


Phase 1 (2024-2026)

This initial phase focuses on establishing foundational institutions and legal frameworks. Key activities include setting up the NHI Fund as a public entity, developing detailed policies, strengthening healthcare delivery systems, and commencing the process for the accreditation of healthcare service providers. During this period, the rollout of the national digital patient registration system (Health Patient Registration System – HPRS) and the piloting of key systems are expected. Providers are encouraged to use this time to get certified by the Office of Health Standards Compliance (OHSC) and otherwise become “NHI-ready”. Notably, Phase 1 also involves preparing amendments to other health laws, including a Medical Schemes Amendment, to redefine the role of medical aids.


Phase 2 (2026-2028)

This phase is intended for scaling up to full NHI operations. The Act envisages that by Phase 2, the NHI Fund will begin actively purchasing services and enrolling providers. This includes the “selective contracting of health care services from private providers,” meaning doctors and hospitals are anticipated to start signing contracts with the NHI to serve registered patients. Additional funding streams, such as new taxes or reallocated budgets, are expected to be mobilized in this phase. The ultimate goal by the end of Phase 2 is a fully functional single-payer NHI Fund by 2028, covering a comprehensive package of services for all South Africans.


Post-2028

If the rollout proceeds according to plan, South Africa would have a universal health coverage system from 2028 onwards. Medical schemes are expected to play a much smaller, complementary role, as they will be legally prohibited from duplicating services already covered by the NHI. However, the government acknowledges that implementation will be iterative, with benefit expansion continuing gradually, potentially beyond 2028. Full national coverage, especially for complex services like specialist and surgical care, is unlikely before 2032.


Government Objectives vs. Likely Implementation Reality

While the government’s commitment to NHI is strong, as evidenced by the Act being signed into law, there’s a significant difference between the stated objectives and the likely reality of implementation timelines. Healthcare professionals should approach NHI as a long-term, phased transition that will reshape healthcare financing and delivery.


Likely Implementation Reality:

  • Administrative systems and certification processes are starting, but selective provider accreditation will likely be limited to public facilities and early pilot sites in the initial phase (2024-2026). Private sector inclusion is expected to be slow and partial.
  • Selective contracting of private providers (2026-2028) may face significant delays due to ongoing litigation, technical gaps in digital systems, funding shortfalls, and persistent workforce shortages. It is anticipated that most private practitioners may only begin contracting in late Phase 2 or even beyond, with limited services initially covered.
  • Full NHI implementation with comprehensive benefit coverage and integrated purchasing is projected to continue beyond 2028. Comprehensive national coverage is unlikely before 2032, with complex services potentially delayed further.

These realistic caveats are crucial for doctors to consider in their preparation. The “wait and see” approach is not recommended; instead, proactive engagement is advised to mitigate risks and ensure practice sustainability.

Major Points of Opposition and Legal Challenges

The NHI Act has immediately prompted a flurry of legal challenges from various private-sector stakeholders, highlighting significant concerns across constitutional, economic, and operational fronts.


A. Constitutionality & Legal Rights:

Section 33, a key and highly contested provision, states that once NHI is fully implemented, medical schemes may only offer “complementary cover” for services not reimbursable by the Fund. This effectively restricts medical schemes to “top-up” insurance only for services excluded from the NHI benefit package, preventing duplicate coverage. Critics argue this provision could worsen public funding needs, deplete resources, and severely undermine patient choice. Constitutional advocates deem this limitation irrational and potentially infringing on rights such as patient choice, property rights (if forced contributions are at stake), and existing benefits, as well as the right to security of tenure (Section 25). Werksmans Attorneys, for example, warn that forcing all individuals to become NHI “users” could conflict with constitutional rights if not carefully structured.


B. Economic Feasibility & Funding:

A major concern for critics is the vague and potentially unsustainable funding model. Major insurers (like Discovery, Momentum, and AfroCentric), business groups, and economists warn that funding the NHI as written would require massive tax increases and is economically unfeasible. The estimated annual cost is R460 billion, with an additional R200 billion in new taxes needed. The Health Funders Association and private sector players have lodged legal action citing unviable regimens and fiscal shortfalls, backed by independent reports showing unsustainable tax hikes and reduced access for scheme members. The absence of finalized funding regulations accompanying the Act is a significant concern.


C. Quality & Workforce Impact:

Concerns have been raised about a possible decline in healthcare standards, longer patient wait times, and administration-heavy systems that might drive doctors out of the country, exacerbating existing workforce shortages. Some express a general mistrust in the government’s capacity to steward systemic reform without mismanagement. Professor Lucy Gilson, a leading health policy academic, highlights that the NHI law is largely silent on human resources and health worker issues, emphasizing that “service delivery requires people, not just money”. She argues that thousands of new primary care doctors, nurses, and administrators will be needed, and their training, supervision, and morale must be adequately planned.


D. Provincial Pushback:

Provinces, notably the Western Cape, have formally opposed draft NHI regulations, flagging risks to their healthcare operations and public service efficacy. They view some regulations as premature and jurisdictionally inappropriate.


Current Legal Proceedings:

  • Board of Healthcare Funders (BHF) and SA Private Practitioners Forum (SAPPF): These groups sought judicial review of the President’s assent to the NHI Act. In May 2025, the Gauteng High Court ruled it has jurisdiction to hear their case and ordered President Ramaphosa to provide the “record of decision” regarding his signature of the Act. The applicants argue the President should have referred the Bill back to Parliament due to serious objections raised on affordability and feasibility. The BHF also asked the Pretoria High Court to overturn the President’s assent as unlawful.
  • Health Funders Association: Representing 20 medical schemes, this association launched its own challenge in June 2025, arguing the NHI Act is “fiscally impossible and operationally unworkable” without private sector collaboration.
  • SA Medical Association (SAMA): In April 2025, SAMA announced its intention to mount “the most comprehensive” challenge yet, contesting multiple provisions of the Act. SAMA cites “logistical flaws” (e.g., mandatory national registration to use healthcare, even in emergencies) and a lack of clarity on covered services due to conflicting definitions of the benefits package. It also warns of onerous accreditation standards that could overburden doctors for less pay. SAMA’s legal team intends to press on constitutional, administrative, and operational grounds, not just Section 33.
  • Other groups such as the Democratic Alliance (DA), Solidarity, AfriForum, Business Unity South Africa (BUSA), and the SA Health Professionals Collaboration (SAHPC) have also initiated or plan legal actions. As of mid-2025, the litigation is pending; the courts have allowed the cases to proceed but have not yet invalidated any provisions of the Act. Despite these challenges, the political will for NHI remains strong, with the government viewing it as a “generational change” for health equity.


Impact on Medical & Health Professionals

The NHI is poised to fundamentally reshape how medical professionals practice in South Africa, bringing both challenges and opportunities.


A. Private Practice Shifts:

  • Accreditation Requirement: All practitioners will be required to comply with NHI Fund-accredited standards and pricing. This means a shift from traditional private billing to a centralized payment system under NHI contracts.
  • Fee Structures: The NHI will replace the existing billing freedom for many services with standardized, NHI-set fees. This transition, particularly for many services from traditional fee-for-service to capitation or bundled payment models, will significantly affect financial planning and service delivery for practices. This could potentially reduce profitability and increase administrative burden.
  • Loss of Autonomy: Private practices may experience a reduction in independence and flexibility if they become bound by NHI protocols and contracts.

B. Service Volume & Demand:

  • As coverage expands under NHI, patient volumes are expected to surge in both public and private sectors. This will drive higher workloads for existing staff.
  • Provider shortages, already apparent in public healthcare, could worsen if clinicians emigrate due to dissatisfaction with the new system, potentially compromising access to care.

C. Primary Care Strengthening:

  • The NHI model strongly emphasizes primary healthcare (PHC) as the gatekeeper to the system. This means family physicians and general practitioners will play an enhanced role in clinical governance and district-level implementation.
  • Adjustments to clinical workflows to support referral pathways and team-based primary care models will be essential to ensure continuity of care. Engaging with local public health structures (district health management offices and PHC contracting units) to understand collaborative pathways and shared care models is crucial.

D. Medicolegal and Ethical Considerations:

  • While the NHI Act does not explicitly change professional liability standards, the increased government role could affect malpractice dynamics. The Fund may issue directives on protocols that could impact the standard of care, though existing duties under the Health Professions Act and Medical Ethics remain.
  • Professional indemnity insurance should be reviewed, as some current policies may not cover care under the new system.
  • Practitioners must remain vigilant about patient rights, including the right to complain and appeal decisions (an Appeal Tribunal is established in Chapter 9 of the Act). Ethical practice, informed consent, and patient confidentiality (compliant with the PoPI Act) continue to be paramount under the Constitution and related laws.

Given the high likelihood of NHI implementation, albeit with phased rollout and potential delays, medical professionals must take proactive steps to prepare their practices. This guide outlines critical areas of focus:


1. Legal and Administrative Readiness:

  • Ensure Practice Registration and Licensing: All medical professionals must ensure their practice is registered with the relevant professional council (e.g., HPCSA, SANC) and that all licensing is up to date.
  • Commence OHSC Certification Process: This is a crucial first step. Practices and facilities must obtain certification from the Office of Health Standards Compliance (OHSC) to prepare for NHI accreditation. This involves undergoing facility audits and implementing remedial actions where gaps are identified, aligning with quality norms such as patient record management, infection control, and patient safety standards. Conduct a gap analysis of your facility’s infrastructure, staffing, and standards against national compliance standards.
  • Stay Informed on Accreditation Criteria: Actively follow accreditation criteria and pilot project opportunities released by the NHI Fund and Department of Health. Engage with provincial and district health departments for early inclusion in public-private collaboration initiatives.
  • Professional Indemnity and Regulatory Compliance Insurance: Apply for or review existing professional indemnity and regulatory compliance insurance to manage emerging risks associated with the new system.

2. Digital Health Preparedness:

  • Adopt Electronic Health Record (EHR) Systems: Implement or upgrade an EHR system that is capable of integrating with the national Health Patient Registration System (HPRS) and the future NHI billing platform. This is perhaps the most important preparatory step, as the NHI will rely on a centralized national health information system.
  • Ensure IT Infrastructure Compatibility: Verify that your IT infrastructure can interface with HPRS and the NHI claims platform, with robust cybersecurity measures in place. The HPRS is already being rolled out as an initial step toward a national patient EHR.
  • Train Staff in Digital Practices: Train clinical and administrative staff in digital data capture, electronic patient registration, clinical coding, and electronic billing practices. Being comfortable with electronic billing and reporting will be essential, as claims to the NHI Fund will likely be submitted electronically.
  • Compile and Clean Practice Data: Begin compiling and cleaning practice data, including your service mix, patient profiles, and referral networks, to meet anticipated NHI reporting and contracting requirements.

3. Service Delivery Alignment / Clinical Readiness:

  • Familiarize with National Guidelines: Clinical teams must familiarize themselves with national treatment guidelines (Standard Treatment Guidelines – STGs) and essential medicine lists (EML). Standardize your practice’s care protocols with these lists.
  • Adjust Clinical Workflows for Referrals: Restructure clinical workflows to support referral pathways and team- based primary care models, ensuring continuity of care. Develop formal referral agreements with local public clinics and hospitals, and participate in multidisciplinary care teams where possible.
  • Engage with Local Public Health Structures: Begin engaging with local public health structures (district health management offices and PHC contracting units) to understand collaborative pathways and shared care models.

4. Contracting and Payment Readiness:

  • Prepare for Selective Contracting: When the selective contracting process opens in Phase 2, prepare the necessary documentation, including quality assurance, service capacity declarations, and compliance certificates.
  • Transition to New Payment Models: Prepare for a transition to capitation or bundled payment models, which will replace traditional fee-for-service for many services. Understand how these models will affect your financial planning and service delivery. The Fund will determine payment rates annually.
  • Restructure Billing Practices: Adapt billing practices and financial management systems to accommodate capitation-based and value-based reimbursement models. Train administrative staff in compliance with digital claims submission, medical coding, audit preparation, and reporting requirements.
  • Prepare for Data Audits: Be ready for data audits and contract performance reviews by the NHI Fund and OHSC. The Fund has powers to recover overpayments and inspect records, so compliance with contract terms is legally binding.

5. Operational Scaling:

  • Scale Practice Capacity: Consider scaling practice capacity, including staffing levels, extended hours, and community outreach services, to handle increased patient volumes anticipated under NHI.
  • Establish/Upgrade Systems for Claims: Establish or upgrade systems for real-time claims submission, financial reconciliation, audit preparation, and compliance monitoring.
  • Anticipate Higher Patient Throughput: Recalibrate appointment planning, triage, and team structures to anticipate higher patient throughput. Invest in scalable workloads, potentially through group consultations, task-shifting, allied health support, and digital triage where feasible.

6. Continuous Learning & Advocacy:

  • Participate in Policy Discussions: Actively engage in professional associations’ policy discussions and submit comments on proposed regulations. Stay engaged in negotiations with the Department of Health and the NHI Fund.
  • Keep Abreast of Legal Developments: Monitor legal developments, especially court rulings and regulatory amendments to contested sections like medical scheme limitations (Section 33).
  • Establish Practitioner Networks: Foster learning networks (regional or digital) to share best practices and troubleshooting tips. Schedule regular training refreshers aligned with NDoH updates, court rulings, or changes in regulations.

7. Patient Engagement:

  • Educate Patients: Proactively educate patients about the NHI registration process, their rights as NHI users, and the expected changes in the healthcare system.
  • Update Consent Forms and Privacy Policies: Ensure patient consent forms and privacy policies comply with the Protection of Personal Information Act (PoPI Act) and the NHI’s health information sharing requirements.
  • Patient Registration: Begin registering patients on the Health Patient Registration System (HPRS) where possible, as every patient will need to register as an NHI user at their first point of contact.

8. Training and Adaptation:

  • Curriculum Updates: Medical schools and training institutions will need to update curricula to include NHI-related knowledge, such as health system management, multidisciplinary team care, and information system use.
  • Continuing Education: Experienced practitioners should seek continuing education on NHI processes, and teaching hospitals should incorporate NHI standards into case training.
  • Collaboration: Prepare for increased collaboration with nursing and allied health professionals in team-based care models under NHI.


Conclusion

The National Health Insurance Act represents a generational change in South Africa’s healthcare system. While its full implementation is subject to ongoing phased activation and the outcomes of significant legal challenges, the Act is now law, and the government is actively preparing for its rollout. Medical professionals cannot afford to wait passively for final clarity. Proactive engagement with legal, administrative, digital, and clinical readiness steps now will ensure they are well-placed to meet accreditation requirements, contract with the NHI Fund, and protect their practice sustainability, ultimately ensuring patients retain access to high-quality, accredited care in the future NHI environment. The prudent path is to assume the NHI will proceed and to be fully prepared for its implementation.

Maud Letzler

Maud is a senior legal professional with over 18 years’ experience across the healthcare, medical, and insurance sectors. A qualified Legal Counsel and Advocate, she specialises in regulatory compliance, medical malpractice, professional indemnity, and complex litigation. Maud has advised Boards, executive teams, insurers, brokers, and healthcare professionals on risk management, cross-border legal matters, and emerging regulatory developments, including POPIA, GDPR, informed consent, and healthcare legislation. She has represented clinicians before regulatory bodies and courts, acts as a mediator and arbitrator, and is a published author on medical and contract law. Her work is grounded in practical, future-focused legal insight that protects professionals while supporting sustainable business outcomes.